52 research outputs found

    Distributional Effects of Globalization in Developing Countries

    Get PDF
    We discuss recent empirical research on how globalization has affected income inequality in developing countries. We begin with a discussion of conceptual issues regarding the measurement of globalization and inequality. Next, we present empirical evidence on the evolution of globalization and inequality in several developing countries during the 1980s and 1990s. We then examine the channels through which globalization may have affected inequality discussing theory and evidence in parellel. We conclude with directions for future research.

    The Evolution of Price Discrimination in the European Car Market

    Get PDF
    Car prices in Europe are characterized by large and persistent differences across countries. The purpose of this paper is to document and explain this price dispersion. Using a panel data set extending from 1980 to 1993, we first demonstrate two main facts concerning car prices in Europe: (1) The existence of significant differences in quality adjusted prices across countries, with Italy and the U. K. systematically representing the most expensive markets. (2) Substantial year-to-year volatility that is to a large extent accounted for by exchange rate fluctuations and the incomplete response of local currency prices to these fluctuations. These facts are analyzed within the framework of a multiproduct oligopoly model with product differentiation. The model identifies three potential sources for the international price differences: price elasticities generating differences in markups, costs, and import quota constraints. Local currency price stability can be attributed either to the presence of a local component in marginal costs, or to markup adjustment that is correlated with exchange rate volatility; the latter requires that the perceived elasticity of demand is increasing in price. We find that the primary reason for the higher prices in Italy is the existence of a strong bias for domestic brands that generates high markups for the domestic firm (Fiat). In the U. K. higher prices are mainly attributed to better equipped cars and/or differences in the dealer discount practices. The import quota constraints are found to have a significant impact on Japanese car prices in Italy, France and the U. K.. With respect to local currency price stability, 2/3 of the documented price inertia are attributed to local costs, and 1/3 to markup adjustment that is indicative of price discrimination. Based on these results we conjecture that the EMU will substantially reduce the year-to-year volatility observed in the car price data, but without further measures to increase European integration, it will not completely eliminate existing cross-country price differences. ZUSAMMENFASSUNG - (Die Entwicklung der Preisdiskriminierung im europĂ€ischen Automobilmarkt) Die Autopreise in Europa sind durch große und bestĂ€ndige Unterschiede zwischen LĂ€ndern gekennzeichnet. Ziel dieses Beitrages ist es, diese Preisstreuung zu erklĂ€ren. Anhand eines Paneldatensatzes fĂŒr den Zeitraum von 1980 bis 1993 wird erstens aufgezeigt, daß signifikante Unterschiede in qualitĂ€tsangepaßten Peisen zwischen den LĂ€ndern bestehen, wobei Italien und Großbritannien die teuersten MĂ€rkte aufweisen. Zweitens lassen sich betrĂ€chtliche Schwankungen von Jahr zu Jahr feststellen, die vor allem auf WechselkursverĂ€nderungen und unvollstĂ€ndige Reaktionen bei der lokalen Preissetzung zurĂŒckzufĂŒhren sind. Diese Sachverhalte werden im Rahmen eines Mehr-produkt-Oligopol-Modells mit Produktdifferenzierung analysiert. Das Modell identifiziert drei potentielle Quellen fĂŒr internationale Preisunterschiede: PreiselastizitĂ€ten, die unterschiedliche Gewinnspannen erzeugen, Kosten- und ImportquotenbeschrĂ€nkungen. Inwieweit diese Ursachen im einzelnen zutreffen, wird fĂŒr die verschiedenen LĂ€nder ausfĂŒhrlich erörtert. Insgesamt lassen die Ergebnisse darauf schließen, daß sich im Gefolge der europĂ€ischen WĂ€hrungsunion die von Jahr zu Jahr zu beobachtenden Schwankungen der Automobilpreise verringern dĂŒrften; sie verdeutlichen aber auch, daß ohne weitere Maßnahmen in Richtung europĂ€ische Integration die existierenden Preisunterschiede zwischen den einzelnen LĂ€ndern nicht vollstĂ€ndig verschwinden werden.

    A Framework for Identifying the Sources of Local-Currency Price Stability with an Empirical Application

    Get PDF
    The inertia of the local-currency prices of traded goods in the face of exchange-rate changes is a well-documented phenomenon in International Economics. This paper develops a framework for identifying the sources of local-currency price stability. The empirical approach exploits manufacturers’ and retailers’ first-order conditions in conjunction with detailed information on the frequency of price adjustments in response to exchange-rate changes, in order to quantify the relative importance of markup adjustment by manufacturers and retailers, local-cost non-traded components, and nominal price rigidities, in the incomplete transmission of exchange-rate changes to prices. The approach is applied to micro data from the beer market. We find that on average, 54.1% of the incomplete exchange rate pass-through is due to local non-traded costs; 33.7% to markup adjustment; and 12.2% to the existence of price adjustment costs.currency prices, exchange rates

    The evolution of price discrimination in the European car market

    Full text link
    "Die Autopreise in Europa sind durch große und bestĂ€ndige Unterschiede zwischen LĂ€ndern gekennzeichnet. Ziel dieses Beitrages ist es, diese Preisstreuung zu erklĂ€ren. Anhand eines Paneldatensatzes fĂŒr den Zeitraum von 1980 bis 1993 wird erstens aufgezeigt, daß signifikante Unterschiede in qualitĂ€tsangepaßten Peisen zwischen den LĂ€ndern bestehen, wobei Italien und Großbritannien die teuersten MĂ€rkte aufweisen. Zweitens lassen sich betrĂ€chtliche Schwankungen von Jahr zu Jahr feststellen, die vor allem auf WechselkursverĂ€nderungen und unvollstĂ€ndige Reaktionen bei der lokalen Preissetzung zurĂŒckzufĂŒhren sind. Diese Sachverhalte werden im Rahmen eines Mehrprodukt- Oligopol-Modells mit Produktdifferenzierung analysiert. Das Modell identifiziert drei potentielle Quellen fĂŒr internationale Preisunterschiede: PreiselastizitĂ€ten, die unterschiedliche Gewinnspannen erzeugen, Kosten- und ImportquotenbeschrĂ€nkungen. Inwieweit diese Ursachen im einzelnen zutreffen, wird fĂŒr die verschiedenen LĂ€nder ausfĂŒhrlich erörtert. Insgesamt lassen die Ergebnisse darauf schließen, daß sich im Gefolge der europĂ€ischen WĂ€hrungsunion die von Jahr zu Jahr zu beobachtenden Schwankungen der Automobilpreise verringern dĂŒrften; sie verdeutlichen aber auch, daß ohne weitere Maßnahmen in Richtung europĂ€ische Integration die existierenden Preisunterschiede zwischen den einzelnen LĂ€ndern nicht vollstĂ€ndig verschwinden werden." (Autorenreferat)"Car prices in Europe are characterized by large and persistent differences across countries. The purpose of this paper is to document and explain this price dispersion. Using a panel data set extending from 1980 to 1993, we first demonstrate two main facts concerning car prices in Europe: (1) The existence of significant differences in quality adjusted prices across countries, with Italy and the U.K. systematically representing the most expensive markets. (2) Substantial year-to-year volatility that is to a large extent accounted for by exchange rate fluctuations and the incomplete response of local currency prices to these fluctuations. These facts are analyzed within the framework of a multiproduct oligopoly model with product differentiation. The model identifies three potential sources for the international price differences: price elasticities generating differences in markups, costs, and import quota constraints. Local currency price stability can be attributed either to the presence of a local component in marginal costs, or to markup adjustment that is correlated with exchange rate volatility; the latter requires that the perceived elasticity of demand is increasing in price. We find that the primary reason for the higher prices in Italy is the existence of a strong bias for domestic brands that generates high markups for the domestic firm (Fiat). In the U.K. higher prices are mainly attributed to better equipped cars and/or differences in the dealer discount practices. The import quota constraints are found to have a significant impact on Japanese car prices in Italy, France and the U.K. With respect to local currency price stability, 2/3 of the documented price inertia are attributed to local costs, and 1/3 to markup adjustment that is indicative of price discrimination. Based on these results we conjecture that the EMU will substantially reduce the year-to-year volatility observed in the car price data, but without further measures to increase European integration, it will not completely eliminate existing cross-country price differences." (author's abstract

    The Evolution of Price Dispersion in the European Car Market

    Get PDF
    Car prices in Europe are characterized by large and persistent differences across countries. The purpose of this paper is to document and explain this price dispersion. Using a panel data set extending from 1980 to 1993, we first demonstrate two main facts concerning car prices in Europe: (1) The existence of significant differences in quality adjusted prices across countries, with Italy and the U.K. systematically representing the most expansive markets; (2) Substantial year-to-year volatility that is to a large extent accounted for by exchange rate fluctuation and the incomplete response of local currency prices to these fluctuations. These facts are analyzed within the framework of a multiproduct oligopoly model with product differentiation. The model identifies three potential sources for the international price differences: price elasticities generating differences in markups, costs, and import quota constraints. Local currency price stability can be attributed either to the presence of a local component in marginal costs, or to markup adjustment that is correlated with exchange rate volatility; the latter requires that the perceived elasticity of demand is increasing in price. We find that the primary reason for the higher prices in Italy is the existence of a strong bias for domestic brands that generates high markups for the domestic firm (Fiat). In the U.K. higher prices are mainly attributed to better equipped cars and/or differences in the dealer discount practices. The import quota constraints are found to have a significant impact on Japanese car prices in Italy, France, and the U.K. With respect to local currency price stability, 2/3 of the documented price inertia are attributed to local costs, and 1/3 to markup adjustment that is indicative of price discrimination. Based on these results, we conjecture that the EMU will substantially reduce the year-to -year volatility observed in the car price data, but without further measures to increase European integration, it will not completely eliminate existing cross-country price differences.

    Trade and Informality in the Presence of Labor Market Frictions and Regulations

    Get PDF
    We build an equilibrium model of a small open economy with labor market frictions and imperfectly enforced regulations. Heterogeneous firms sort into the formal or informal sector. We estimate the model using data from Brazil, and use counterfactual simulations to understand how trade affects economic outcomes in the presence of informality. We show the following: 1) Trade openness unambiguously decreases informality in the tradable sector but has ambiguous effects on aggregate informality. 2) The productivity gains from trade are understated when the informal sector is omitted. 3) Trade openness results in large welfare gains even when informality is repressed. 4) Repressing informality increases productivity but at the expense of employment and welfare. 5) The effects of trade on wage inequality are reversed when the informal sector is incorporated in the analysis. 6) The informal sector works as an “unemployment buffer” but not a “welfare buffer” in the event of negative economic shocks
    • 

    corecore